Table of Contents
Indicators 3c |
1) Number of interval IUDs inserted by network providers |
2) Number of PPIUDs inserted by network providers | |
3) Number of implants inserted by network providers | |
4) Percentage of network providers scoring at least 75% on questions in Section 3 and Section 4 (1-14) of Provider IUD study questionnaire | |
5) Percentage of network providers reporting a score of 4 or 5 on a 5-point Likert scale for the statement "Providing IUD insertion services is a good use of my skills and experience" | |
6) Percentage of network providers inserting at least 9 IUDs per quarter | |
7) Percentage of network providers that met IUD insertion potential | |
8) Increasing network provider IUD insertion trends | |
9) Assessing Universe of Need at clinic/facility level |
Indicator 3c-1 |
Number of interval IUDs inserted by network providers |
Workplan: X IUDs inserted by network providers by Dec. 2018 | |
Indicator Type |
Mandatory |
Where Reported |
Workplan, Tracker |
Numerator |
# interval IUDs inserted by network providers |
Denominator |
N/A |
Purpose |
To measure long term method availability in the private sector |
Data Source |
MIS |
Data Collection Frequency |
Monthly |
Notes: |
Definition:
|
Indicator 3c-2 |
Number of PPIUDs inserted by network providers |
Optional Activity Level Indicator | |
Indicator Type |
Optional (MUST INCLUDE if country program includes PPIUD activities) |
Where Reported |
Workplan, Tracker |
Numerator |
# PPIUDs inserted by network providers |
Denominator |
N/A |
Purpose |
To measure long term method availability in the private sector |
Data Source |
MIS |
Data Collection Frequency |
Monthly |
Notes: |
Definition:
|
Indicator 3c-3 |
Number of implants inserted by network providers |
Workplan: X implants inserted by network providers by Dec. 2018 | |
Indicator Type |
Optional (MUST INCLUDE if country program includes WHP implants) |
Where Reported |
Workplan, Tracker |
Numerator |
# implants inserted by network providers |
Denominator |
N/A |
Purpose |
To measure long term method availability in the private sector |
Data Source |
MIS |
Data Collection Frequency |
Monthly |
Notes: |
Guidance:
|
Indicator 3c-4 |
Percentage of network providers scoring at least 75% on questions in Section 3 and Section 4 (1-14) of Provider IUD study questionnaire |
Workplan: Increase, from X to Y, the percentage of network providers scoring at least 75% on questions in section 3 and section 4 (1-14) of Provider IUD study questionnaire, by Dec. 2018 | |
Indicator Type |
Mandatory |
Where Reported |
Workplan, Tracker |
Numerator |
# of network providers meeting the criteria |
Denominator |
total # of network providers surveyed |
Purpose |
To measure provider knowledge on IUD |
Data Source |
Provider longitudinal survey |
Data Collection Frequency |
Twice during project period |
Notes: |
Definition:
|
Indicator 3c-5 |
Percentage of network providers reporting a score of 4 or 5 on a 5-point Likert scale for the statement "Providing IUD insertion services is a good use of my skills and experience" |
(Not in workplan, internal only – not reported to donor) | |
Indicator Type |
Mandatory |
Where Reported |
Workplan, Tracker |
Numerator |
# of network providers reporting 4 or 5 on statement |
Denominator |
total # of network providers surveyed |
Purpose |
To measure provider attitude on IUD |
Data Source |
Provider longitudinal survey |
Data Collection Frequency |
Twice during project period |
Notes: |
Definition:
|
Indicator 3c-6 |
Percentage of network providers inserting at least 9 IUDs per quarter |
(Not in workplan, internal only – not reported to donor) | |
Indicator Type |
Mandatory |
Where Reported |
Tracker only |
Numerator |
# of network providers who have provided at least 9 IUD insertions in the quarter |
Denominator |
total # of providers in network |
Purpose |
To measure long term method availability in public and private sectors |
Data Source |
MIS |
Data Collection Frequency |
Monthly |
Notes: |
Definition:
|
Indicator 3c-7 |
Percentage of network providers that met IUD insertion potential |
(Not in workplan, internal only – not reported to donor) | |
Indicator Type |
Mandatory |
Where Reported |
Tracker only |
Numerator |
# of network providers meeting cumulative potential |
Denominator |
total # of providers in network |
Purpose |
To measure long term method availability in private sector |
Data Source |
MIS and Provider potential worksheet |
Data Collection Frequency |
Insertion data collected monthly from providers |
Notes: |
Definition:
|
Indicator 3c-8 |
Increasing network provider IUD insertion trends |
Workplan: Percentage of network providers who demonstrate increasing trends in the number of IUD insertions over time | |
Indicator Type |
Mandatory |
Where Reported |
Workplan |
Numerator |
N/A |
Denominator |
N/A |
Purpose |
Background: In order to visualize the trajectory of provider insertion rates over time, the Foundation would like to see a graphical representation of average provider insertion, accounting for the fact that some providers have an ‘advantage’ over others, having joined the network earlier. Programmatic Utility: To determine if providers are continuing to increase their insertion rates, have reached a plateau, or are declining, indicating reduced motivation. This analysis will group providers by ‘cohorts’ based on when they joined the network. The rationale for this is that providers who have had the benefit of longer periods of medical detailing, demand creation, and other support should have higher output than those who are new to the network (and to IUD insertion). |
Data Source |
MIS; Automatically calculated in Provider Metrics Tool (PMT) |
Data Collection Frequency |
Semi-annually |
Notes: |
Definition:
|
Indicator 3c-9 |
Assessing Universe of Need at clinic/facility level |
(Not in workplan, internal only) | |
Indicator Type |
Optional |
Where Reported |
Internal only |
Purpose |
Background: As a complement to the provider potential calculations, and to assuage Foundation concerns that the calculation does not account for the need in a provider’s area of influence, all platforms will also measure, but not report on, the universe of need in a provider’s area of influence. In the future, we may assess the need being met by the provider by taking the ratio of a provider’s total yearly insertions by the need in the area. This calculation will determine the number of potential IUD users in a provider’s catchment area, given available data on population size, unmet need, and IUD specific CPR. Programmatic Utility: As demonstrated by Nepal, this calculation can be used to guide IPC workers regarding how many contacts they should make in a provider’s catchment area or area of influence in order to reach a point where demand is self-propagating. In the case of Nepal, they concluded that they would reach approximately 10% of the universe of need in each catchment area, and used this figure to calculate how many contacts an IPC agent should have weekly, as well as how many agents should be assigned to an area. The utility of this is dependent upon the size of the catchment area (described below) as well as the nature of the IPC program. The data may also be used to motivate providers regarding potential demand in their areas. |
Data Source |
MIS |
Data Collection Frequency |
Annually |
Notes: |
Method of measurement:
|